PMC

A. children HBeAg positive patients containing A1762T/G1764A double mutation; B. children HBeAg positive patients not containing double mutation; C. children HBeAg negative patients containing double mutation; D. children HBeAg negative patients not containing double mutation; E. adult HBeAg positive patients containing double mutation; F. adult HBeAg positive patients not containing double mutation; G. adult HBeAg negative patients containing double mutation; H. adult HBeAg negative patients not containing double mutation.

Changes in Double Support Percentage with the Mode, Inclination and Load a) Double support percentage (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) illustration of interaction between inclination and the load. Significant interaction ($) of double support percentage increasing more during the 20 kg load condition than the 00 kg load condition between level and uphill inclinations. b) Double support percentage SD (mean ± SD), which indicates higher SD for treadmill (TM) than overground (OG) walking (^) and for the 40 kg condition compared to the 20 kg condition (*).

Training load and strain and total score of fatigue recorded over the 8-week training programme.
Note: † and ‡: higher than the precedent value; †P<0.05, ‡P<0.01; *: lower than the precedent value;* P<0.05, ** P<0.01

Load and capacity of maltase and SGLT1 at different caloric requirements
Comparisons of maltase capacity, SGLT1 capacity and their respective functional loads of maltose (in the direct form of dietary maltose) and glucose (after hydrolysis of dietary maltose by maltase). Dietary maltose load (mmol day⁻¹) equals the product of dietary intake (g day⁻¹) times dietary maltose concentration (mmol g⁻¹); glucose load upon SGLT1 = 2 times the dietary maltose load; capacity = intestinal mass (mg) times protein activity (mmol day⁻¹ mg⁻¹). Glucose load on SGLT1 (left axis) is double the disaccharide load (right axis) on maltase because each maltose potentially yields two glucose molecules for transport by SGLT1. Note that, in each reproductive state (virgin and lactating) the maltase capacity considerably exceeds the SGLT1 capacity. Note also that maltase capacity increases by a smaller factor from virgin to lactating mice than does maltose load, and that SGLT1 capacity increases by a smaller factor than does glucose load, so that safety factors of both proteins decrease during lactation.